Journey through Assessment - Join me as I journey through the diverse tapestry of assessment in education, uncovering its intricacies, challenges, and transformative potential. Keep reading…
Definition of Assessment: Assessment encompasses a systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting evidence to make judgments to determine an individual's or group's learning progress, performance, or attainment of specified learning outcomes (Guskey, 2023). It involves various methods, tools, and techniques to gather data on what learners know, understand, and can do, enabling educators to evaluate effectiveness, make instructional decisions, and provide feedback for improvement (Stiggins, 2014; Stiggins, 2018).
Determining Lesson Objectives through Backward Design: Good teachers often employ backward design when determining lesson objectives for assessments (Davis & Autin, 2020; Whitehouse, 2014). This approach entails beginning with the ultimate objectives in mind and then devising instructional activities and assessments in reverse order to ensure alignment with those goals. Here's how it works:
- Identify the goals or objectives for the lesson.
- Determine what evidence of learning would demonstrate mastery of those objectives.
- Design assessment tasks or activities that elicit the desired evidence of learning.
Type of Assessment: Open-ended, Selected Response, or Performance? Teachers choose the best type of assessment based on learning goals, context, and student outcome objectives (Stiggins, 2014). Each type of assessment offers unique insights into students' abilities, progress, and areas for growth, contributing to a holistic approach to assessment and evaluation in education (In'nami & Koizumi, 2009). Each type has benefits and limitations:
Open-Ended Assessment (In'nami & Koizumi, 2009):
o Purpose: Open-ended assessment tasks require students to generate responses independently, without predetermined choices or constraints. They encourage critical thinking, creativity, and higher-order reasoning skills.
o Methods: Open-ended assessment methods include essays, extended responses, projects, and performances. These methods allow students to demonstrate depth of understanding, apply knowledge in authentic contexts, and communicate ideas effectively.
o Benefits: Open-ended assessment promotes authentic assessment of students' abilities, allowing for diverse responses and interpretations. It fosters deeper engagement with content, as students are encouraged to think critically and express themselves creatively (Harris et al., 2019).
o Limitations: Open-ended assessment tasks are more time intensive and may lack consistency in scoring across different assessors. They require clear criteria and rubrics to ensure fairness and objectivity in assessment.
Selected-Response Assessment (In'nami & Koizumi, 2009):
o Purpose: Selected-response assessment tasks present students with a set of predetermined options from which to choose their responses. They are efficient for assessing factual knowledge and understanding.
o Methods: Selected-response assessment methods include matching items, true/false, and multiple choice options. These methods provide clear and concise answer choices, facilitating efficient grading and analysis.
o Benefits: Selected-response assessment allows for standardized administration and scoring, ensuring consistency and reliability in assessment results. It provides immediate feedback to students and can be easily scored using automated methods.
o Limitations: Selected-response assessment may primarily assess recall of factual information rather than deeper understanding or critical thinking skills. It may also be susceptible to guessing and test-taking strategies, leading to inflated scores.
Performance Assessment (In'nami & Koizumi, 2009):
o Purpose: Performance assessment tasks require students to demonstrate specific skills, abilities, or competencies through authentic, real-world tasks or activities. They assess application and synthesis of knowledge in context (Ortega, & Minchala, 2017).
o Methods: Performance assessment methods include presentations, demonstrations, simulations, portfolios, and authentic tasks. These methods provide opportunities for students to showcase their skills, creativity, and problem-solving abilities.
o Benefits: Performance assessment fosters deeper learning by engaging students in meaningful, hands-on activities. It promotes transfer of knowledge to practical contexts and prepares students for real-world challenges and situations.
o Limitations: Performance assessment tasks may be resource-intensive. They require clear criteria and rubrics to ensure fair and consistent evaluation. Additionally, they may lack standardization compared to more traditional forms of assessment.
Effort Grades: Effort grades evaluate students' level of engagement, persistence, and dedication to learning tasks (Nagy, 2016).
Pros include:
- Encouraging students to develop a strong work ethic and study habits.
- Recognizing and rewarding students for their commitment to learning.
- Providing valuable feedback on non-academic skills such as time management and perseverance.
- Subjectivity in assessment, as effort is subjective and can be influenced by various factors (McTighe, & Frontier, 2022).
- Potential for bias or unfairness in grading based on perceptions of effort.
Student Self-Assessment: Student self-assessment involves students reflecting on their own learning progress, strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. It can be accomplished through self-reflection journals, rubrics, or peer feedback (Andrade, 2019).
Pros include:
- Promoting metacognitive skills and self-regulated learning.
- Encouraging ownership of learning and fostering independence.
- Providing insights into students' perceptions and understanding of their progress.
- Lack of objectivity in self-assessment, as students may overestimate or underestimate their abilities.
- Need for guidance and scaffolding to help students develop accurate self-assessment skills.
- Potential for students to be overly critical or self-deprecating without constructive feedback.
Student Growth Portfolios: Student growth portfolios are collections of student work samples, reflections, and assessments compiled over time to document and showcase individual learning progress and achievements (Deeba et al., 2023).
Benefits include:
- Providing a holistic view of student growth and development across multiple areas.
- Supporting authentic assessment and personalized learning by focusing on individual strengths and needs.
- Engaging students in reflective practice and goal-setting.
- Time and resource-intensive to create and maintain portfolios.
- Subjectivity in selecting and interpreting portfolio artifacts.
- Limited standardization and comparability across students or classrooms.
Use Figures to Represent an Analyze Assessment: Figures such as tables, graphs, charts, and diagrams can aid in the assessment process by visually representing data, trends, and relationships (Loeb et al., 2017). For example, in a science experiment, a graph showing the relationship between variables can help students analyze and interpret results, draw conclusions, and make predictions. Figures enhance comprehension, facilitate data analysis, and promote critical thinking skills.
· Facilitating Data Analysis: Figures allow students to analyze and interpret data more efficiently by presenting information in a structured and organized format. For example, a bar chart comparing the populations of different countries enables students to quickly identify patterns and trends, facilitating comparative analysis and inference making.
· Promoting Critical Thinking Skills: Engaging with figures requires students to critically evaluate and interpret the information presented (Hermann et al., 2020). They must analyze relationships, identify trends, and draw conclusions based on evidence. For instance, when interpreting a line graph depicting temperature changes over time, students are prompted to consider factors influencing the data and make informed predictions or hypotheses.
· Supporting Learning: Figures often serve as visual aids in inquiry-based learning approaches, where students actively explore and investigate phenomena (Saher et al., 2022). For instance, in a biology class, a diagram illustrating the stages of mitosis can serve as a reference point for students as they conduct experiments or investigations related to cell division processes.
· Communication Skills: Figures can facilitate communication of findings and ideas, both visually and verbally. Students can use figures to support their explanations, arguments, and presentations, enhancing their communication skills and ability to convey complex concepts effectively to others (Loeb et al., 2017).
· Encouraging Data-driven Decision Making: Figures provide tangible evidence for decision making, allowing students to base their conclusions and recommendations on empirical data. Whether analyzing market trends in economics or interpreting geological maps in earth science, students develop skills in using evidence to support their reasoning and decision making.
Other Viewpoints on Assessment
Assessment in education encompasses a multifaceted footing that extends far beyond traditional tests and exams. While these traditional forms of assessment hold their place in evaluating student performance, they represent only a fraction of the diverse approaches teachers use to gauge learning, growth, and development. In this section, I will explore different viewpoints on assessment, each shedding light on different aspects of the educational journey. These viewpoints include standardized testing, behavior assessment, parent-teacher conferences, and assessment for instructional improvement. Each perspective offers unique insights into how educators, students, and parents navigate complex elements of education. The explorations of these viewpoints, offers insights into the ways assessment shapes teaching and learning experiences, influences decision-making processes, and fosters collaboration among stakeholders.
Standardized Testing: Pros and Cons
- Provides standardized measures that represent student mastery and performance and enhance comparison fidelity among students, schools, districts, and states.
- Empirical data based on educational standards, goals, and other specific criteria.
- Can inform policy decisions and educational funding allocations based on aggregated data.
- May create undue anxiety and stress for students, when high stakes are attached to test scores (Thomas et al., 2017).
- May not adequately represent diverse student abilities, learning styles, and talents.
- May perpetuate inequities in education, as standardized tests may be culturally biased or disadvantage certain groups of students.
- Evaluates non-academic skills and behaviors essential for learning, such as social skills, responsibility, and self-regulation.
- Provides insights into students' emotional well-being and classroom climate.
- Can inform targeted interventions and support services for students with behavioral challenges.
- May be subjective, as assessments of behavior can be influenced by individual biases and perceptions.
- May be culturally biased, as behavioral norms and expectations can vary across cultures (Young et al., 2018).
- Requires careful interpretation and consideration of context to avoid misjudgments or misinterpretations.
- Facilitate direct partnership of communication and collaboration between parents and teachers to help students grow and learn (Al-Hattami, 2019).
- Provide opportunities for parents to gain insight into children’s academic successes and areas for improvement.
- Allow teachers to share classroom expectations, goals, and strategies with parents, promoting consistency and alignment between home and school (Munthe, & Westergård, 2023)..
- May be limited by time constraints, as conferences are typically scheduled for brief periods.
- May be influenced by differing perspectives or expectations between parents and teachers, leading to potential conflicts or misunderstandings.
- Require careful planning and preparation to ensure productive and meaningful discussions.
- Involves using assessment data to inform instructional decisions, such as lesson planning, instructional strategies, and curriculum development (Gneezy et al., 2019).
- Allows for differentiation to reach students’ diverse and unique needs based on their strengths, weaknesses, and learning preferences.
- Enables teachers to provide timely and targeted feedback to students, guiding their learning and promoting growth.
- Supports the identification of areas where students may need additional support or intervention, facilitating early intervention and remediation (Bajaj et al., 2018).
- Encourages a data-driven approach to teaching, fostering reflective practice and continuous improvement among educators.
- Requires ongoing professional development and collaboration among teachers to effectively utilize assessment data and implement evidence-based instructional practices.
References
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Bajaj, J. K., Kaur, K., Arora, R., & Singh, S. J. (2018). Introduction of feedback for better learning. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 12(12), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/36744.12402
Clipart Library. (n.d.) Student testing. https://slcconline.helpdocs.com/course/what-is-backward-design
Davis, T. C., & Autin, N. P. (2020). The Cognitive Trio: Backward Design, Formative Assessment, and Differentiated Instruction. Research Issues in Contemporary Education, 5(2), 55-70.
Deeba, F., Raza, M. A., Gillani, I. G., & Yousaf, M. (2023). An investigation of role of portfolio assessment on students’ achievement. Winter 2023, 3(1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i1.125
Gneezy, U., List, J. A., Livingston, J. A., Qin, X., Sadoff, S., & Xu, Y. (2019). Measuring success in education: The role of effort on the test itself. American Economic Review: Insights, 1(3), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180633
Guskey, T. (2023, April 24). Giving Retakes Their Best Chance to Improve Learning. Educational Leadership Online. https://tguskey.com/wp-content/uploads/EL-23-Re-assmts1-2.pdf
Harris, C. J., Krajcik, J. S., Pellegrino, J. W., & DeBarger, A. H. (2019). Designing knowledge‐in‐Use assessments to promote deeper learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(2), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12253
Hermann, Z., Horn, D., Köllő, J., Sebők, A., Semjén, A., & Varga, J. (2020). The impact of reading and mathematics test results on future earnings and employment. The Hungarian
In'nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2009). A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance: Focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Language Testing, 26(2), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208101006
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573325.pdf
McTighe, J., & Frontier, T. (2022). How to provide better feedback through rubrics: Well-crafted rubrics create a shared language that lets teachers and students work together. Educational Leadership, 79(7), 17–23.
Munthe, E., & Westergård, E. (2023). Parents', teachers', and students’ roles in parent-teacher conferences; a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 136, 104355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104355
Nagy, R. (2016). Tracking and visualizing student effort: Evolution of a practical analytics tool for staff and student engagement. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 165–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.8
Ortega, D. P., & Minchala, O. E. (2017). Assessing students in an authentic and ongoing manner in the English classroom. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.01
Salt Lake Community College. (n.d.). Backward Design. https://slcconline.helpdocs.com/course/what-is-backward-design
Saher, A.-S., Ali, A. M. J., Amani, D., & Najwan, F. (2022). Traditional versus authentic assessments in higher education. Pegem Journal of Education & Instruction/Pegem Egitim ve Ögretim, 12(1), 283–291. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1329835.pdf
Stiggins, R. (2014, March 5). A new vision of excellence in assessment. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHX2jnKNiyw
Stiggins, R. (2018). Better assessments require better assessment literacy. Educational Leadership, 75(5), 18–19.
Thomas, C., Cassady, C., & Heller, S. (2017). The influence of emotional intelligence, cognitive test anxiety, and coping strategies on undergraduate academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.001
Whitehouse, M. (2014). Using a backward design approach to embed assessment in teaching. School Science Review, 95(352), 99-104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308033072_Using_a_backward_design_approach_to_embed_assessment_in_teaching
Young, A., Andrews, C., Hayes, C., & Valdez, C. (2018). Should teachers learn how to formally assess behavior? Three educators' perspectives. International Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 416– 426.